Medical Opinion -
Depression Published 17 November 2004 This Editorial has been
written by the specialist opinion leader, Allan H Young, Professor of
Psychiatry, Royal Victoria Infirmary, University of Newcastle and published in
the latest issue of the serial publication,
Drugs in
Context.
Depression is an extremely common, debilitating
condition that affects around 8% of the general population at any one time,
with the lifetime risk being considerably higher. The magnitude of this
disorder is such that up to half of women and one-quarter of men will be
affected by depression at some point during their lives. Depression frequently
becomes chronic, with at least 20% of sufferers remaining ill 2 years after an
initial diagnosis. In addition, the recurrence rate is greater than 90%. Not
surprisingly, such a prevalent condition has a significant impact on the health
service resources and the global economy. Consequently, one of the main
challenges faced daily by GPs is how to identify, diagnose and treat this large
section of the population.
Antidepressants remain the cornerstone of
our treatment strategy for depression. Significant advances have been made in
this setting during the past 50 years. The first agents introduced were the
tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs).
Although these drugs exhibit good clinical efficacy, their reputation has been
tarnished somewhat by their cardiotoxicity in overdose, troublesome
side-effects at therapeutic doses and significant drug interactions. These
factors have profound effects on patient compliance and may thus reduce
treatment success. Over the subsequent decades our knowledge of the
pharmacology of depression has been refined, and the newer antidepressants have
tended to be selective reuptake blockers, usually of serotonin. With the
emergence of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the serotonin
and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) such as venlafaxine, and a new
drug class represented by mirtazapine - the noradrenergic and specific
seratonergic antidepressants - we appear to have circumvented many of the
negative aspects of the older agents without a loss of antidepressant efficacy.
Despite these advances, the majority of primary-care guidelines
continue to recommend that TCAs should be considered as first-line therapy for
depression in patients without suicidal ideation. This, I would argue,
represents at best misguided advice and, at worst, dangerous practice. Not all
patients with suicidal thoughts will communicate their feelings to their
doctor. In addition, these thoughts may not be apparent at the time of
consultation and may manifest before the medication becomes fully effective.
Given the availability of equally effective yet safer agents, the balance has
surely shifted sufficiently for us to prescribe the newer drugs ahead of the
TCAs and MAOIs, which should perhaps be reserved for treating the most severely
affected or treatment-resistant patients referred to the specialist? Even the
somewhat short-sighted tablet-for-tablet economic rationale used to
support the use of the TCAs as first-line therapy is now outweighed by
considerable evidence to the contrary when indirect costs are taken into
account.
The use of drug therapy early in the course of the illness is
likely to bring about greater therapeutic benefit, and long-term maintenance
treatment is often necessary. Whilst drug therapy is fundamentally important in
patient management, improving the rate of detection of depression should be one
of our main goals. Advances in physician interviewing techniques, longer
consultation times, the use of simple screening devices and just taking the
care to ask about mood can increase the detection of depression. Despite the
revolution in the management of depression, there are still many patients who
do not respond to treatment. Thus, the more appropriate use of existing agents
and/or the development of more effective, novel classes of drugs is required.
In fact, this remains an area of active drug development. In the future, the
development of other novel antidepressants that offer even greater clinical
benefits for all our patients remains a tantalising prospect.
|
For more information, you can download a
free-of-charge
Quick Reference Guide to the Mirtazapine in Depression
issue of Drugs in Context which is designed to give you an insight into
the numerous key points of information and practical guidance contained in each
issue, via carefully selected quotations taken directly from each part of the
publication.
Electronic versions (PDF) of the individual parts of this
issue of Drugs in Context are available for purchase at
ThePharmYard as follows:
|
Disclaimer
OnePharm Internet
excludes any warranty, express or implied, as to the quality, accuracy,
timeliness, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose of this briefing.
OnePharm Internet will not be liable for any claims, penalties, losses,
damages, costs, or expenses arising from the use of or inability to use this
briefing or from any unauthorised access to or alteration of the Briefing.
OnePharm Internet makes no warranty that the contents of this briefing are
compatible with all computer systems and browsers.
|